Current rates of global plastic pollution may trigger potentially ‘irreversible effects’, according to a new study by researchers from Sweden, Norway and Germany.
According to the authors of “The global threat from plastic pollution”, published in Science (2021), plastic pollution is a ‘global threat’, and reducing emissions requires ‘drastic actions’.
As of 2016, estimates of global emissions of plastic to the world’s lakes, rivers and oceans ranged from 9 to 23 million metric tonnes per year, with a similar amount emitted onto land yearly. These estimates are expected to almost double by 2025 if business-as-usual scenarios apply, according to the study.
“Plastic is deeply engrained in our society, and it leaks out into the environment everywhere, even in countries with good waste-handling infrastructure,” says Matthew MacLeod, Professor at Stockholm University, and lead author of the study.
The cost of ignoring the accumulation of persistent plastic pollution in the environment could be enormous. The rational thing to do is to act as quickly as we can to reduce emissions of plastic to the environment
He says that emissions are trending upward even though awareness about plastic pollution among scientists and the public has increased significantly in recent years.
Mine Tekman, a PhD candidate at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany and co-author of the study, says plastic pollution is not just an environmental issue but also a “political and economic” one.
She believes that the solutions currently on offer, such as recycling and clean-up technologies, are not sufficient, and that we must tackle the problem at its root.
“The world promotes technological solutions for recycling and to remove plastic from the environment. As consumers, we believe that when we properly separate our plastic trash, all of it will magically be recycled.
“Technologically, recycling of plastic has many limitations, and countries that have good infrastructures have been exporting their plastic waste to countries with worse facilities.
“Reducing emissions requires drastic actions, like capping the production of virgin plastic to increase the value of recycled plastic, and banning export of plastic waste unless it is to a country with better recycling” says Tekman.
Plastic accumulates in the environment when amounts emitted exceed those that are removed by clean-up initiatives and natural environmental processes, which occurs by a multi-step process known as weathering.
“Weathering of plastic happens because of many different processes, and we have come a long way in understanding them. But weathering is constantly changing the properties of plastic pollution, which opens new doors to more questions,” says Hans Peter Arp, researcher at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) and Professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) who has also co-authored the study.
“Degradation is very slow and not effective in stopping accumulation, so exposure to weathered plastic will only increase,” says Arp. Plastic is therefore a “poorly reversible pollutant,” both because of its continuous emissions and environmental persistence.
Remote environments are particularly under threat, says co-author Annika Jahnke, researcher at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) and Professor at the RWTH Aachen University.
“In remote environments, plastic debris cannot be removed by cleanups, and weathering of large plastic items will inevitably result in the generation of large numbers of micro- and nanoplastic particles as well as leaching of chemicals that were intentionally added to the plastic and other chemicals that break off the plastic polymer backbone.
“So, plastic in the environment is a constantly moving target of increasing complexity and mobility. Where it accumulates and what effects it may cause are challenging or maybe even impossible to predict.”
On top of the environmental damage that plastic pollution can cause on its own, by entanglement of animals and toxic effects, it could also act in conjunction with other environmental stressors in remote areas to trigger ‘wide-ranging or even global effects’, the researcher state.
The new study lays out a number of ‘hypothetical examples’ of possible effects, including exacerbation of climate change because of disruption of the global carbon pump, and biodiversity loss in the ocean where plastic pollution acts as additional stressor to overfishing, ongoing habitat loss caused by changes in water temperatures, nutrient supply and chemical exposure.
Taken all together, the authors view the threat that plastic being emitted today may trigger ‘global-scale, poorly reversible’ impacts in the future as ‘compelling motivation’ for tailored actions to strongly reduce emissions.
“Right now, we are loading up the environment with increasing amounts of poorly reversible plastic pollution. So far, we don’t see widespread evidence of bad consequences, but if weathering plastic triggers a really bad effect we are not likely to be able to reverse it,” cautions MacLeod.
“The cost of ignoring the accumulation of persistent plastic pollution in the environment could be enormous. The rational thing to do is to act as quickly as we can to reduce emissions of plastic to the environment.”
The article “The global threat from plastic pollution” is published in Science (2021) and written by Matthew MacLeod, Hans Peter H. Arp, Mine B. Tekman and Annika Jahnke.