Plastic treaty talks stall as almost 100 countries reject draft deal

 

Plastic pollution

Talks to agree a global treaty to tackle plastic pollution are on the brink of collapse as almost 100 countries reject the draft deal.

The talks in Geneva were scheduled to conclude with an agreement today, but have now stalled.

Almost 100 countries have reportedly rejected the draft treaty text as it does not include caps on plastic production.

The previous meeting in Busan, South Korea, ended without agreement as several oil-producing nations rejected plastic production caps.

Ahead of the talks in Geneva, the United States reportedly urged several countries to reject limits on plastic production and plastic chemical additives.

In the communications dated July 25 and shared with countries at the outset of talks on Monday, the U.S. outlined its non-negotiable positions, which place it in direct opposition with more than 100 countries.

Sian Sutherland, Co-Founder, A Plastic Planet, Plastic Health Council, said the draft treaty is ‘doomed to be rejected’ by many member states as it ‘fundamentally fails’ to reflect the agreed goals set at INEA5.2 in 2022.

The science is clear: to reduce plastic pollution, we must make and use less plastic to begin with, so a treaty without reduction is a failed treaty.

“The UN assembly has been presented with a draft treaty that fails to mention the three most critical words: health and production caps,” Sutherland said.

“By ducking binding limits on production, the draft hands the fossil fuel industry a lifeline in plastics as the world moves away from oil and gas.”

Nicholas Mallos, vice president of Ocean Conservancy’s ocean plastics programme, called the draft text ‘completely unacceptable’.

“Further, the section on funding is inadequate for any treaty to be effectively implemented, threatening the ability for many Member States to achieve the goals of the agreement,” Mallos said.

“The science is clear: to reduce plastic pollution, we must make and use less plastic to begin with, so a treaty without reduction is a failed treaty.”

WWF has called on governments to reject the ‘deeply concerning’ text.

Zaynab Sadan, Global Plastics Policy Lead & Head of Delegation for INC-5.2, WWF, said: “Let’s be clear, this is not a global treaty. This is a collection of national and voluntary measures that will do nothing to address the worsening plastics crisis.

“After more than two and a half years of negotiations, this is the furthest we’ve been from finalising an effective treaty.”

“The ambitious majority of governments that have committed time and time again to a strong and effective treaty must immediately reject this text.”

Commenting, Diane Crowe, Group Sustainability Director at Reconomy, the international circular economy specialist, said: “After five rounds of inconclusive negotiations that began in 2022 to adopt a globally binding plastics treaty, this really is the last meaningful opportunity to reach an ambitious agreement on plastics.

“As plastic production has grown exponentially over the last few decades, we urge the delegates gathered from 170 countries to finally agree to a treaty that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics.”

Privacy Overview
Circular Online

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is temporarily stored in your browser and helps our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

More information about our Cookie Policy

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality and the website cannot be used properly without them. These cookies include session cookies and persistent cookies.

Session cookies keep track of your current visit and how you navigate the site. They only last for the duration of your visit and are deleted from your device when you close your browser.

Persistent cookies last after you’ve closed your Internet browser and enable our website to recognise you as a repeat visitor and remember your actions and preferences when you return.

Functional cookies

Third party cookies include performance cookies and targeting cookies.

Performance cookies collect information about how you use a website, e.g. which pages you go to most often, and if you get error messages from web pages. These cookies don’t collect information that identifies you personally as a visitor, although they might collect the IP address of the device you use to access the site.

Targeting cookies collect information about your browsing habits. They are usually placed by advertising networks such as Google. The cookies remember that you have visited a website and this information is shared with other organisations such as media publishers.

Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website and display content that is more relevant to you and your interests across the Google content network.

Send this to a friend